Posts Tagged ‘ Music genre ’

History of a Chart 2. “Rock V The World”

See also:

—————————————————————————————–

(click to see full interactive chart)

A simple chart but effective in allowing the user to track each of the music genres over time, and see them in context. The lower lines are still crowded, but being able to separate them off allows the user to see where they are placed. As rock was the backdrop to the entire study, I made it the backdrop to all of the charts. It allows the user to compare rock against the other values at any point, instead of having to assess 2 lines together.
The chart clearly shows the battle for chart supremacy between rock and pop and the rise of one, as the other falls. We can also see the introduction and rise of hiphop on the charts, and the decline of the classical/orchestral/jazz section since the 70’s.

Idea

The very first chart I created with this data was a line graph that showed ALL of the genres (more in those early stages before I merged some of them together). The idea was effective but the chart was incredibly cluttered.

A problem that emerged time and time again was one of scale. Pop and rock were such HUGE genres, with large data sets, yet the smaller genres, still important, disappeared among other small genres at the base of the chart.

I then decided to brush up on my Flash (something I had wanted to avoid, as I was hoping to create a larger static visualization) and create an interactive chart that allowed the user to select the genre they wanted, and also be able to see them all together in context.

Method

A chart for each genre was created in Tableau (using the same axis and scale to maintain accuracy)

These were then exported into Illustrator (for re-colouring), and into Flash to build into a rollover chart.

Evolution

The chart above was the result of much manipulation and “playing” in Tableau. Here are some of the more interesting developments during that process.

Inspiration: n/a

Idea: This was one of the first charts I created in Tableau with my data set. I wanted to get a simple overview of the charts and judge the best way to show it. The line version of this remains the simplest way to show the chart.

Method: With Year on the X axis, and Measure Value on Y, and colour set to mark GENRE, this plotted out the values of each genre per year.

Why Ditched: This chart has no real value  it is near impossible to distinguish any flow as there is so much data crammed into a small space.   I reverted to the line version.

Inspiration: n/a

Ideato show a definite sense of trend over time

Method: To use the POLYGON setting in Tableau to show the overall trends between the various genres over time.

Why Ditched: I am still unconvinced about the benefits of the POLYGON chart. Whilst you can quickly see the trend, it simply shows a line from the start of the chart to the end, and highlights the above and below points. Whilst this may be useful for a definite data set, this is very much a part-data set. I chose to begin in 1970, but that is in no way the start of music. This chart would look very different were I to all music over a different time period. It does highlight a moment where rock and pop switched over in terms of dominance, but overall I decided it was overly simplistic and better suited to financial static data.

Inspiration: DNA charts (example: DNA chart)

Idea: to use a simple heat map to show the presence, and strength of presence, of each genre over time. 3 shades of colour would be given to each genre – not present (grey for each) then dark and light to show the high and low values.

Method: This  was created with separate charts for each genre, to account for the vastly different scales. So it marked the relative values of each genre separately. I then exported the layers, and placed them together in Illustrator.

Why Ditched: I was pleased with this chart and how it looked (I later have doubts about it’s validity – see next chart) but at this stage I was interested to see it displayed in a circle. I hoped I would be able to widen the data areas to make it less cramped.

Inspiration: Jake Kennedy Hobart – The Rain Project,

Idea: I wanted to use the chart above to create a circular, or semi circular chart. I hoped I would be able to stretch out the size of each unit, so it would appear less cluttered.

Method: Using the table created above (and removing any excess white at each side), I used the Envelope Distort function in Illustrator to bend it into a 100% circle.

Why Ditched: I realized that the original method of shading was giving a false impression of the chart. I was comparing each music genre on its own scale, yet placing them next to each other, giving the impression that they were on the same marked scale.  This only shows that pop and rock were a lot more present in the charts than the others, not by how much. A simpler and more accurate chart would have show simple presence, or no presence – colour and no colour. This lighter colour is deceiving.

Inspiration: n/a

Idea: Despite the issues with the colour on the last chart, I was keen to attempt another circular chart using the same process (ie bending a rectangular chart into a curve). Again, I hoped that chart that formerly suffered for lack of space would benefit from a circular shape.

Method: I created a line chart, showing all of the genres (distinguished by colour) on a black background (it showed the lines up clearer than white). I then concluded that I would have to break the chart into quarters, to enable a full 360deg circle to be created (I later solved this problem). For demonstration purposes I created one 90deg bend, and simply copied it 3 more times, and placed the quarters into a circle.

Why Ditched: I was concerned that, as with the simple line chart, the smaller genres (classical, spoken word etc) were being lost at the centre of the chart and therefore were unreadable – rendering the chart useless.

Inspiration: as above

Idea: as above but I hoped  – by reversing the chart and having the smaller values on the outside, wider part of the circle, they would be clearer

Method: I simply turned the chart upside down before creating the circle shape – hence the larger values were on the inside

Why Ditched: Although this did make the smaller values easier to see, it went against logic to have the larger values at the centre of the chart. Naturally the eye would treat the middle of the circle as the bottom of the line chart, hence reading the values upside down. The chart was not useful in any form .

Inspiration: C. Van Vleck | Information Taking Shape,

Idea: Still interested in pursuing the idea of a circular chart, I decided to solve the problem of concealed and cluttered data, by attempting an interactive rollover chart in Flash. This means that even if the data is hidden, the user can make a selection and see it in isolation as well as in relation to the other values.

Method:  I created a full stacked bar chart, with each colour block showing the percentage of albums each genre represented per year. Exporting this as a PDF into Illustrator I was able to recolour the chart (to help distinguish the smaller genres). I then created 8 versions of the chart, each of them with one colour highlighted and the rest “greyed out”. In Flash I converted  the menu boxes into a series of rollover buttons and each showed a version of the chart with the respective colour highlighted. Roll off, and the whole chart was shown.

Why Ditched: I was essentially happy with this chart. It was a little fuzzy about showing the smaller genres and all in all it was difficult to compare respective values (a design fault of the stacked bar chart and its transformation into a circle). However, the main reason for scrapping this chart was the discovering of a major error in the data that would have required redrawing the chart from scratch at a late stage. I took a judgement call that it was not strong enough a visualization to construct again from scratch.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Genres: have I missed anything?

carolinebeavon’s genre Bookmarks on Delicious

I have become a little bogged down in genre classification.

It’s a much written-about subject, with very little resolution – apart from that it’s impossible to set out a rigid format for music classification.

I decided to contact a series of organisations who deal with music classification, or at least deal with it as part of their field of expertise.

  • Spotify (“Unfortunately everyone here at Spotify is working extremely hard to deliver the best service possible which means that we won’t be able to help with your request this time”)
  • Gracenote Press – no reply

The British Library say this on their website

We do not categorise individual recordings by genre – there would be too many arguments and it would be too time-consuming (although some of our data from external sources is tagged by genre so there are some occurrences). You are likely to find some entries by using the genre as a search word in the subject field – this will bring up entries that others (record compilers, broadcasters) have decided fit into that particular category. If you are stuck for examples of a particular type of music you can contact us at the address below.

In the end I decided a crowdsourced project was in order – as long as the categories I decided upon, covered all the music sub-genres out there.

I created  Google Docs image, and  – by sending the link out via Twitter/Facebook, allowed people to add  / remove / move genres of music.

The Aim was to hopefully draw attention to any discrepancies within genres – was I covering all bases? Were there any sub-genres which significantly crossed main genres?

There was a flurry of interest, and people were keen to add sub-categories, but not one person added or suggested a main category

  1. Had I nailed it and come up with a definitive mini-list of genres?
  2. Did I not make it clear that people COULD add categories?

It also became clear that there was a LOT of crossover between Urban and Dance.

I wondered: should I merge the 2 categories? I asked Twitter …

carolinebeavon caroline beavon
Thanks to everyone collaborating on this http://bit.ly/dXMZj7. One question: Should I merge urban and dance or would that be too general?
in reply to ↑

theaardvark

@theaardvarktheaardvark
@carolinebeavon No. Urban and Dance are very different genres, although modern commercial urban has a large overlap with dance.

theaardvark theaardvark

@
@carolinebeavon I was thinking more spec in the last few years, as Rap & Hip Hop has plundered Electro, Garage & House for beats & tunes.

theaardvark theaardvark

@
@carolinebeavon …But I don’t think you can place Rap & Happy Hardcore in the same Genre… I’d say Urban & Dance are too different.
Enhanced by Zemanta